wp-plugin-bluehost
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home2/lorriego/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114We keep hearing about this historic election, which it certainly would have been had the first woman become president. But what exactly do we mean by pronouncing Donald Trump\u2019s ascension \u201chistoric?\u201d He certainly isn\u2019t the first white man to assume the presidency. Nor is he the first to lose the popular vote. Do we mean he is the first reality TV star? The first candidate with absolutely no experience as an elected official? No record of public or military service? The first to conduct a campaign primarily through Twitter? The first to prove his point<\/a> over and over again, at least metaphorically, that he could stand and shoot somebody in the middle of Fifth Avenue and not lose any votes?<\/p>\n There are definitely many firsts that Donald Trump represents. But the word \u201chistoric\u201d connotes breakthrough progress, not a regression to the meanness of Trump\u2019s campaign. To call his election \u201chistoric\u201d is to dignify a man who traffics in constant degradation and divisiveness. Such euphemistic language elevates him to a level he does not deserve. It is another in a long string of false equivalencies that have poisoned our politics.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" We keep hearing about this historic election, which it certainly would have been had the first woman become president. But what exactly do we mean by pronouncing Donald Trump\u2019s ascension \u201chistoric?\u201d He certainly isn\u2019t the first white man to assume … Continue reading