Spring into Winter

The weather’s been wild across the country, including here in California. Rain, floods, mudslides, and now snow have caused a lot of damage. But also much joy, since we’ve been living for years with constant worry about drought and fires.

February is our spring here in the Bay Area. After a rainy January, the sun came out and delivered our usual Valentine of flowering plum trees. I’m a Valentine’s baby, and during a birthday walk, I discovered a downed branch laden with blossoms, which another woman and I split to bring the ephemeral beauty into our homes. Such an unexpected gift along with the usual one:

Already the blossoms have mostly given way to unfurling red and green leaves (the poison oak is unfurling at a pretty good clip too). But the daffodils are resplendent:

We had a dry spell for a couple of weeks, but thankfully, the rain started up again. Temperatures plummeted, and it began to snow, bringing blizzard warnings to LA and anxious ski resorts a break, at least until the snow closed major interstates. People have been skiing and sledding in Napa County, heart of the nearby wine country that’s been ravaged by fire and drought the last several years. From our living room window, we are agape at Mt. Tam, dusted with snow (some of it still there days later):

We have been growing webs between our toes, but the rain kindly stopped this afternoon so I could take a walk.

Then it began to hail. Oh, well. I am euphoric about the stuff coming down from the heavens, and here’s some euphorbia to celebrate:

Christmas Passed

I love decorating for Christmas, filling the house with greens, red berries, white flowers, and candles. I love hauling out our vast collection of ornaments, decorating the tree (though not stringing the lights), setting up the wooden trains we bought when the girls were little.

I also love dismantling Christmas after the New Year. This time, though, packing away the ornaments came with a dose of poignancy. I separated out all of Emma’s, fully expecting that they will no longer grace our tree, but hers and her partner’s in Christmases to come. After all, that has been the goal of our annual ornament ritual ever since our daughters were born. Just like our children, they are not ours to keep, but to send off into the world created and inhabited by our grown-up kids. (As long as said kids are capable of setting up more than a knee-high tree for their own Christmas traditions).

We’ve done without Ally’s ornaments since 2019, when she and her now-husband began hosting their own tree-trimming parties with a six-footer. Emma and her partner moved in together earlier this year, so I offered to gather her ornaments for the Big Transfer when we saw them at Thanksgiving. I confess to an inner sigh of relief when she declined, since they were going to spend the holidays away from home. But home is where the heart is, and their new home is full of heart. Even in this year of going elsewhere, Emma’s partner set up a miniature Christmas village and tiny tree. After all, he’s father to an 11-year-old and long accustomed to the habits of adulthood. I see a six-footer in their Christmas Future together.

So Emma’s ornaments are now in their own shoe box. As I went through our lists of how each of our ornaments came into the household, I was glad to see that some of the more hideous ones were from Emma’s era of gaudy poor taste (i.e., not mine)—gold-painted reindeer, a plastic peace sign, a plastic speed boat. I will miss, naturally, those selected by my superior taste, before she was too young to have a vote, especially this one, which we got for her first Christmas:

I will miss that little one in a cradle, just as I miss my little girls in their cribs and their belief in Santa and infallible parents. But I am thrilled to see them blossom into their own selves, and to pass on the bounty of Christmases past. I have the comfort of my memories, and knowing that these ornaments will forever be where they belong.

Plus, still with us is the ornament I will never relinquish—this inch-long striped stocking for the in-utero and mysterious Tadpole, more than a gleam in our eyes, but not yet known as the wonderful person to come who brought us into the magical world of parenthood:

Endings

It’s the last day of 2022, and time is pretty much running out if I hope to meet my goal of writing at least one blog post a month. I’ve never liked New Year’s Eve, although I enjoyed the Top 40 countdowns when I was young enough to stay at home without FOMO. Come to think of it, maybe the fear of missing out never weighed that heavily on me. During my 20s, I volunteered to take a shift on the crisis line every New Year’s Eve, and felt relieved to have purpose and a place to be without false cheer and a lot of drinking. One of the big reliefs of aging is how pleasant it is to fall into bed before 10:30, maybe having a nice dinner with friends, maybe not.

This year, I decided to finish my very last episode of “This is Us” on the very last day of the year. Fans of the show probably watched the final episode of the sixth season in May this year, when the family-centered, heartstring-pulling drama came to an end. Fans of the show with husbands who don’t like “This is Us,” however, kept forgetting to watch it during the day all by their lonesomes.

I’d pretty much forgotten about “This is Us” until this May, when I was laid up with Covid. I was three seasons behind and not particularly flattened with fatigue, so spent my quarantine catching up. I can see why my husband doesn’t like the show–it’s a bit heavy-handed and sappy, with such idealized family members who are always making great speeches that it can lead to lots of eye-rolling. But I loved it–all the characters (especially Uncle Nicky, the most acerbic and least sappy character), the tough issues tackled, the sense of depth and authenticity and struggle along with the idealization. Besides, Mandy Moore, who plays the main matriarch Rebecca very convincingly through several decades, really reminds me of a charismatic, positive-without-being-cloying, absolutely lovable mom I used to know. And since Ken Olin of “thirtysomething” was a mainstay of our 30s, how could I resist a series where he directed so many of the episodes?

As I made my way through the last season, I didn’t want it to end, so I’d go for weeks without watching. The last season deals with Rebecca’s rapidly advancing Alzheimer’s and death, and the fact that her end was approaching seemed fitting for this year’s end. The journey from life into death was depicted as a lovely Orient Express style train ride (without the murder mystery), in which significant loved ones are there in real life and in memory. Plus, Rebecca on the train looks like she’s dressed for New Year’s Eve!

Lots of heartfelt messages about family bonds and the beauty of life along with the sorrows abound throughout the show, particularly the last couple of episodes. Very corny, very moving. 2022 has been it’s own wild ride–so much sorrow in the world, so much love and laughter personally, especially this past Christmas, with both daughters here along with our new son-in-law and his whole family as well.

Tonight my best friend from graduate school and her husband will arrive, since we’ve all tested negative for Covid. We’ll eat good food and hopefully be in bed before 10:30. It will be the end of a long, trying, and rich year. As “This is Us” unsubtly reminds us, life goes on. 2023, here we come.

Happy New Year!

Missing My Mother

It’s true that my stay-at-home mother was known for her disinterest in cooking and housekeeping. It’s also true that in 1973, I, her youngest child, was a senior in high school who required little hands-on care. Still, I don’t know how my mother managed, well before streaming or even VCRs, to stay glued to the television for all 51 days–sometimes up to 6 hours per session for a total of 237 hours–of the Senate Watergate Hearings.

My mother’s on my mind because today would have been her 99th birthday, but also because last week I watched the last hearing of the House Select Committee investigating the January 6 attack of the U.S. Capitol. There have been 9 live hearings, most lasting 2-3 hours each. You can stream them for free at any time on many different platforms. I am no match for my mother: Even though I am recently retired with a lot of time on my hands and few obligations, I managed to catch only about four hours in real time. (I eventually watched most of them after the fact.)

Apart from streaming, times are different. Up to 80 million people—three out of four households–watched at least some of the Senate Watergate hearings. As the New York Times TV critic James Poniewozik wrote on the eve of Trump’s first impeachment trial, the Watergate hearings were appointment TV, a collective experience that no longer exists.

In contrast, twenty million watched the first of the January 6 hearings, 18 million the last. Lots of people, especially Republicans, tuned them out altogether, and the hearings are not expected to make much difference in next month’s midterm elections. Almost all congressional Republicans have consistently denigrated them.

In 1973, the vote in the Senate was 77-0 to establish the Senate Committee. For our latest constitutional scandal, following Trump’s second impeachment acquittal, an independent commission in the mold of the 9/11 investigation was recommended. The House approved such a measure 252-175, with 35 Republicans joining all Democrats. Senate Republicans blocked the commission’s formation by filibuster. This left only the House to pursue an investigation through the formation of the January 6 Select Committee. Only two Republicans—Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger–joined all Democrats in voting to proceed, and have thus been driven out of today’s GOP. As I said, times are different.

What’s not different is how much I miss my mother in times of political turmoil and great national consequence. Even though I am glad for her sake that being dead for a long time means she’s missed a lot of truly horrendous stuff that probably would have killed her, how I wish we could have watched the January 6 hearings together, or at least texted back and forth across the country!

I imagine starting January 6, 2021, by sharing our joy that both Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff had won their run-off races in Georgia, flipping the U.S. Senate blue. My mother would have loved that. But at least she was spared witnessing Trump’s “wild” rally as it descended into violence.

I, too, was spared live coverage of the unfolding insurrection. My work day of eight back-to-back sessions with psychotherapy clients began just as Mitt Romney shouted, “This is what you’ve gotten!” to his Republican colleagues as the Capitol was breached. I was professionally obligated to be glued to my Zoom screen for the day, not CNN’s live coverage. My information came in snatches from one client after another giving me shocked updates and scrolling through headlines in between sessions.

I followed the news (including Trump’s second impeachment trial for fomenting the insurrection) for days, weeks, months. But the January 6 Committee’s presentation—with lots of live video footage, some of it never before seen–brought it to horrifying life in a way I had missed.

I would have loved to compare notes with my mother. I suspect she would have shared my deep admiration for the January 6 Select Committee members–even and especially Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger (plus, of course, heartthrob Jamie Raskin). To a person they have been dignified, somber, collaborative, and without an iota of grandstanding. They’ve made a compelling, ironclad case for the American people, the Department of Justice, and for history. The Committee’s done so by presenting damning testimony almost entirely from Trump’s own allies–from the hapless January 6 rioter Stephen Ayres to Bill Barr, whose obvious relish in trashing Trump would be funny if it weren’t so maddening. To borrow from Barr’s own twisted interpretation of the Mueller report to protect Trump, the former Attorney General’s turn before the committee “does not exonerate him” from the harm he previously caused.

And hat’s off to the women, especially election workers Shaye Moss and her mother Ruby Freeman. Cassidy Hutchinson and Liz Cheney proved that decency still resides within some Republicans. In fact, feeling sustained admiration for Liz Cheney has been one of the most surprise silver linings of the last year. Who knew?

Here’s what I really would have loved to discuss with my mother: In the closing statements of the final hearing, the low-level foot soldiers of the insurrection were depicted charitably (to put it mildly). Cheney spoke of how Trump had manipulated his followers’ patriotism and love of country. Mike Pence was treated as heroic for refusing to be Trump’s devoted lapdog this one time. Many of Trump’s enablers were similarly and generously let off the hook when January 6 proved a bridge too far for them. This is probably smart strategy. Still, I can’t help but envision my mother and I gagging together over it.

Chairman Bennie Thompson said of Trump, “He is the one person at the center of the storm.” True in one sense, but is he really? Per usual, he is both cause and symptom of the dark forces that have been gathering for some time. As the traitors keep reminding us, “The storm is coming.

I miss my mother, but I’m glad she will miss the storm.

Don’t Be Fooled

My heart sank when I first heard about Lindsey Graham’s proposal for a nationwide abortion ban after 15 weeks of pregnancy. That’s because I thought he might just succeed in tricking people into thinking it was a reasonable idea. After all, before the Dobbs decision eliminated constitutional protection altogether, abortion rights had been slowly eroded for decades by just such “compromises.” Chief Justice Roberts was hoping to preserve a fig leaf of SCOTUS legitimacy by allowing just such a ban to stand in Mississippi without overturning Roe. Plus, a 15-week limit polls well.

I also had to read the fine print to understand that Graham’s proposal did not ensure abortion rights nationwide for the first 15 weeks. Quite the contrary: States would remain perfectly free to restrict abortion at any earlier point, while states with more liberal access would be forced to ban the procedure after 15 weeks. As the saying goes, “Heads we win, tails you lose.”

Still, it’s not unusual for people to react with outrage to egregious proposals before acquiescing to something more in the middle. Graham is trying to quell the intense backlash to overturning Roe by offering something that sounds more reasonable than the draconian restrictions GOP state legislatures are passing right and left.

I myself—staunchly pro-choice my entire life—almost fell for something similar when “partial-birth abortion” entered the anti-choice lexicon in the mid-90s. The descriptions of the procedure were pretty grisly: puncturing the skulls and removing the brains of partially delivered fetuses. It sounded as bad as abandoning newborn infants on Chinese mountaintops simply because they were girls. A steady diet of such horror stories made me wonder who could possibly oppose banning such a practice.

Or so I reacted for a nano-second, until I thought and learned some more. The scary coinage came from the National Right to Life Committee in 1995. The correct term for the medical procedure is “intact dilation and extraction,” a safer method than the prior standard for ending pregnancies after the first trimester. About 95% of abortions occur before 15 weeks, but it’s not exactly like care-free women are casually clamoring to end their pregnancies later on. Some may not have known they were pregnant. Others have been forced to jump through so many hoops already that a safer, simpler abortion option is no longer possible. Most likely, something has gone wrong with a wanted pregnancy, as Pete Buttigieg explained in 2020 at a Fox News Town Hall. Here’s his exchange as reported by Upworthy with moderator Chris Wallace about whether there should be any limits on abortion rights:

“I think the dialogue has gotten so caught up on where you draw the line that we’ve gotten away from the fundamental question of who gets to draw the line,” Buttigieg replied, “and I trust women to draw the line when it’s their own health.”

Wallace wanted to clarify that Buttigieg would be okay with late-term abortion and pointed out that there are more than 6000 women who get third trimester abortions each year.

“That’s right,” responded Buttiegieg, “representing one percent of cases. So let’s put ourselves in the shoes of a woman in that situation. If it’s that late in your pregnancy, than almost by definition, you’ve been expecting to carry it to term. We’re talking about women who have perhaps chosen a name. Women who have purchased a crib, families that then get the most devastating medical news of their lifetime, something about the health or the life of the mother or viability of the pregnancy that forces them to make an impossible, unthinkable choice. And the bottom line is as horrible as that choice is, that woman, that family may seek spiritual guidance, they may seek medical guidance, but that decision is not going to be made any better, medically or morally, because the government is dictating how that decision should be made.”

Reporter Annie Renau then observes:

And that’s really the gist of the pro-choice stance. Why would we want the government to be involved in our most difficult medical and moral dilemmas and decisions?

Exactly. Especially the likes of Lindsey Graham and all the other Forced Birth proponents in government. No matter what the reason or stage of pregnancy.

Luckily, Graham’s proposal has backfired. His intentions are clear, and his own party is mad at him for saying the quiet parts out loud as they busily scrub their websites of draconian anti-choice pronouncements.

Don’t be fooled. Come November 8, Roe, Roe, Roe your vote.

Cupcake!

I’ve never understood the whole cupcake craze. Overpriced, prone to dryness, and small to boot–what’s the point? I expected them to soon disappear from bakery shelves and cafes. Nevertheless, they persist.

So in the spirit of if you can’t lick them, join them, I’m now doing both. In fact, much to my surprise, I find myself diving head first into all things cupcake.

That’s because my daughter and her fiancé have commissioned me to supply cupcakes for their wedding next July. I’m known for the deliciousness of my baking, but presentation is not my strong suit. Charmingly homespun is a generous description. Hence, research and trial runs have begun early.

My friend’s husband, in tackling some major home renovations despite his inexperience, once remarked, “You can do anything with YouTube and poor impulse control.” The same is true for cupcakes. I have watched endless YouTube videos about the perfect buttercream, the best decorating tips, how to get a domed cupcake, how to use a coupler. In my case, the poor impulse control usually expresses itself on my hips, after eating the experiments. This is probably safer than accidentally knocking down a load-bearing wall.

The best part, though, is how the rabbit hole of cupcake tutorials transports me to a different world when our current world is so dispiriting. All the videos feature cheerful people in sparkling kitchens, testifying what a cinch it is to churn out beautiful rainbow-swirled cupcakes. They seem completely and happily removed from reality, which is quite compelling in a world of so much ugliness and hardship..

Delta variant (and now, OMG–omicron!) got you down? No sweat, just keep those pastry bags equipped with star tips coming! Messy withdrawal from Afghanistan? Nothing restores a sense of calm order like clear glass bowls of pastel frosting lined up on the counter.

Cupcakes as antidote to despair. Maybe that’s why the craze has lasted so long.

My preliminary research soon led to the first human trials, aka taste tests. I prepared two kinds of lemon cupcakes, carrot with and without nuts, almond poppy seed, and black bottom cupcakes.

My kitchen and my cupcakes did not look like the ones on YouTube. In fact, my runny buttercream looked like it had been applied by slap-dash, drunken kindergarteners.

It was all delicious, though. Black bottom and nut-less carrot cupcakes were the hands-down favorite for the final cut. My second attempt yielded buttercream actually stiff enough to hold its shape. Besides, the happy couple is fine with charmingly homespun.

So successful were the cupcake trials that I was soon commissioned to make a small wedding cake. My only prior experience was 40 years ago, when my trial wedding cake for a friend luckily happened early enough that there was plenty of time to throw it in the trash and order a real cake from a bakery. I guess that will be our fallback position this time, too.

High stakes, high anxiety–a perfect project to distract me from my 2022 mid-term anxiety!

My first attempt debuted this Thanksgiving. Not exactly ready for prime time, but not bad, either:

And totally delicious!

Twenty Years

Twenty years ago here on the West Coast, the alarm woke me to the news on NPR that a plane had struck the World Trade Center. Was it grogginess, naiveté, or refusal to fathom horrific possibility in those first minutes that made me assume at first it was a terrible, freak accident? The second plane struck as I listened. It became clear that we were under attack.

My husband Jonathan was at a conference in Atlanta. We didn’t know when—or how–he’d be able to get home. While our daughters slept, I called my mother-in-law, who hadn’t yet heard the news. When I told her, she said, “This will be the end of democracy as we know it.”

Prescient, my mother-in-law.

It was time to wake the girls for school, but I didn’t want to. I didn’t want them to leave behind the blissful oblivion of sleep, of the life they had lived thus far, or explain to them what had happened. I didn’t want them to go to school. I didn’t want any of us to leave the house, ever.

Since it was the beginning of the school year, Ally, 10, had invariably caught a cold—sick, like clockwork, every September. I used that as an excuse to stash her in a quiet corner in my office while I worked a reduced schedule. Emma, 13, painted her toenails red, white, and blue, and went off to school. She soon added to her list of reasons why we should get her a cellphone the ability to call out from a pile of rubble. Ally was more noticeably upset than her sister. She announced she was mad at Grandpa for inventing bombs (my father had been a scientist on the Manhattan Project). When I asked if she was worried about war, she replied philosophically, “Yeah, but I just try to stay out of trouble.”

What I most remember is wanting to hold them close, always, and how incomplete we felt without Jonathan home with us. Somehow he made it back from Atlanta after just two days’ delay. (When he needed to travel to Boston two months later, it was Emma who became distraught.)

We never subjected the girls—or ourselves–to endless replay of the towers smoking, burning, collapsing. We watched very little TV, laying eyes on the horror only once or twice. That was more than enough. Instead I devoured stories in the newspaper, particularly stories of unbelievable acts of kindness and courage.

I remember George W. Bush, caught like a deer in the headlights, reading a story about a goat to school children when he learned of the attacks. I remember members of Congress, joining hands and singing “God Bless America” on the Capitol steps after the doomed passengers of United Flight 93 crashed their hijacked plane into a Pennsylvania field instead of its intended target. I remember the President saying something decent and good about our Muslim brethren. Then, more alarmingly, he urged us to go shopping, and announced to the world that “You’re either with us or against us.”

A colleague at a conference by renowned trauma specialist Bessel van der Kolk later reported that he’d said, in response to Bush’s us-vs-them comment, “I knew then that our goose was cooked.”

Stories of goodness started to give way to a thirst for vengeance, escalating rhetoric and militarism. Only Representative Barbara Lee voted against handing Bush a blank check with the Authorization for the Use of Military Force. (She and my mother-in-law are cut from the same cloth.)

We began to bomb Afghanistan. Soon after, our home town became internationally famous because John Walker Lindh—aka the American Taliban—grew up here. Emma was double cast with his sister in their 8th grade theater production. Luckily, John’s sister was able to shine in the spotlight for the first two performances, before the news about her brother broke. At least she was not robbed of that.

Often I post something a bit more hopeful to commemorate what happened twenty years ago, but these days I find hope more elusive. The trauma of 9/11 will be with us for a long time. There are still acts of unbelievable kindness and courage, but bleakness blankets the world. Fear and uncertainty have upended the social fabric, spawning a surveillance state, conspiracy theories, and two disastrous wars. Countless lives are lost and treasure squandered. There’s a clear thread between the terrorists who aimed a hijacked plane at the heart of government and the domestic terrorists who staged an insurrection at the Capitol just this January. 

After the planes struck, it took a while for the towers to collapse. Those planes struck 20 years ago, and we have been in a delayed collapse ever since.

What’s That?!

A couple of weeks ago, I awoke to a strange noise. It sounded like water, but not quite the same as my neighbors’ pump. Was it one of the sprinklers going haywire? It wasn’t Wednesday, the only day we’re now permitted to water in our town. Would I have to put in yet another call to our HOA’s gardener as we try to get it right between water conservation compliance and landscape life support?

Then I noticed the sound wasn’t localized. It was a low drumming everywhere. Could it be…? Of course not! Then again . . .

I rushed outside, exultant. Yes it was! Rain! Splotches darkened the patio, fell on the parched plants. It vanished in a minute, more mirage than reality (except for the photographic evidence).

This rain won’t make any difference whatsoever in our historic mega drought. It won’t even tamp down the dust or matter a jot to the ravaging wildfires consuming California. In a way, it’s a cruel tease.

Yet that distinctive smell, the first sharp inhale that mellows into lingering fecundity!

A whiff of hope.

*

Shrinkrapped subscribers may have noticed a recent mysterious post titled “Test,” with no content or images. Like the aforementioned rain, we might call this a mirage post. No, I am not experimenting with avant-garde blogging that makes Haiku look like a wordy genre. Rather, Shrinkrapped (or possibly my brain) has been broken for more than two weeks (when I first wrote something short and sweet about the elusive rain). The mystery blog was Bluehost’s tech support trying to diagnose the problem. The problem is mostly still there, but working on it! Still needing a whiff of hope, now more than ever, and I bet you are, too! So here you go, in an actual, work-around post when rain and hope—and apparently Shrinkrapped’s brains and blogs—are in short supply!

Boss

At the risk of revealing myself to be the troglodyte that I am, I’m only vaguely aware of Bruce Springsteen. Sure, I once bought one of his CDs a lifetime ago. I also once dated a man who was childhood friends with Springsteen; they and their friends roamed the boardwalk and bars together in Asbury Park. “We knew he was good, but we didn’t know he was that good,” he told me.

In this lifetime, I’m aware that Springsteen and President Obama started a podcast together. I’ve listened to my CD a handful of times, the podcast never. My careful titration of news via scrolling New York Times headlines informs me that Springsteen had a one-man show on Broadway until the pandemic shut it and everything else down last March, and that it has just reopened.

Which is why Terry Gross’s 2016 interview with Springsteen about his memoir, on which the Broadway show is based, just popped up on my Fresh Air queue again. So I gave it a listen.

The Boss was quite charming. He recounted with wry amusement that his father, taking advantage of Bruce’s helpless dependency following a serious motorcycle accident, brought in a barber to chop off his long hair, a source of constant Vietnam-era contention. At the time this act of butchery enraged him. But the decades bring perspective, which brings memoirs, which, if you’re famous enough, bring Broadway shows.

I also learned from Fresh Air that said show had been made into a 2018 film, Springsteen on Broadway, now streaming on Netflix. So I gave it a watch.

I didn’t much like the man who had so charmed me on Fresh Air. Springsteen’s self-mockery came across as arrogance. Plus he seemed kind of shouty, angry. This was probably due to Netflix’s close-in camera work of a lone performer far away from an audience of thousands. He knew what it took to be loud and brash enough to hold a crowd. Still, Springsteen came across as too well rehearsed to feel authentic. This impression was no doubt further cemented when he talked about being a fraud–hero of the working man who had never spent a day of his life on a factory, nor even worked five days in a row until doing this Broadway show. Still, Springsteen clearly comes by his pain and anger honestly, as story after story tells of his difficult relationship with his hard-drinking, constantly wandering father.

So I’m not that much of a fan, but any real fan would be thrilled to get a two-and-a-half hour concert, the songs augmented by the spoken word. Springsteen has the same inability to carry a tune as Bob Dylan and Leonard Cohen, but he shares their gift for poetry.

I gradually warmed to the show, the man. Then midway through, his wife, Patti Scialfa, came on for a couple of duets, and I was electrified. Springsteen softened, transforming from wayward rebel into a mature man who was burnished rather than undone by his pain. Springsteen first met Patti when she was performing in the same bar. He recounted that the first words he heard her sing were, “I know something about love.”

Evidently.

The intensity of their music-making, their chemistry burned through the screen. But it was when Springsteen stood alone and began to talk that I was won over:

“Trust in a relationship is a fragile thing,” he began. “Because trust requires allowing others to see as much of our real selves as we have the courage to reveal . . . it means allowing others to see behind our many masks, the masks we wear, overcoming the fear. Or rather, learning how to love and how to trust in spite of it. That takes a little courage, and a very strong partner.

This seemed like a great toast for our daughter’s wedding next year! Until Springsteen continued:

“‘Cause in this life you make your choices, you take your stand, and you awaken from that youthful spell of immortality where it feels like the road is gonna go on forever. And you walk alongside your chosen partner with the clock ticking. And you recognize that life is finite, that you’ve got just so much time. And so together you name the things that will give your life in that time its meaning, its purpose, its fullness, its very reality. And this is what you build together. This is what your love consists of. This is your life. And these are things you can hold onto when the storms come, as they will.”

Hmm, maybe a little dark for first-time newlyweds? But it was perfect for people who have been together for a long time, and later on I read what I’d jotted down thanks to the miracle of closed-caption TV to my husband, who agreed.

The part of Springsteen’s performance that really slayed me, though, was about a surprise visit from his father. Right before Springsteen’s first child was about to be born, his father drove 500 miles unannounced (“As was his style,” Springsteen remarked). They were sitting together at 7:30 a.m. over beers (“That was also his style”), and suddenly, “My dad, never a talkative man, blurted out, ‘You’ve been very good to us.’ And I nodded that I had. And then he says, ‘And I wasn’t very good to you.’”

This fleeting, sort-of apology was almost imperceptible. But Springsteen’s perceptions are keen:

We are ghosts or we are ancestors in our children’s lives. We either lay our mistakes, our burdens upon them and we haunt them. Or we assist them in laying those old burdens down, and we free them from the chains of our own flawed behaviors. And as ancestors, we walk alongside of them, and we assist them in finding their own way, and some transcendence. My father, on that day, was petitioning me for a role in an ancestral life after being a ghost for a long, long time. He wanted me to write a new end to our relationship, and he wanted me to be ready for the new beginning that I was about to experience. It was the greatest moment in my life with my dad. And it was all that I needed.

I knew Springsteen was good. But I didn’t know he was that good. He is an ancestor for us all.

One Year Out

A year ago, my psychotherapy practice safely operating through a screen, I gave away my office furniture and turned in my keys. I felt lucky about my month-to-month lease but wondered if I was making a mistake. Might things get back to normal with summer here? Premature reopening and optimism soon gave way to an escalating spike in cases and deaths, making it clear that Covid disruption was going to be profound and long-lasting.

As always, I asked my clients how they were doing. After long consideration, one replied, “I’m okay,” before adding, “When things are really okay, that’s when I’ll freak out.”

My client’s remark captures the coping through numbness that has typified the last year and a half. We’ve all experienced the Groundhog Day sensation of being trapped in the same day over and over again. Cut off from our normal lives, we’ve also had to cut off our feelings to survive.

For a long time in therapy, Covid crowded out everything else. Sessions felt like highly repetitive check-ins, with reminders to breathe and practice self-compassion. A close therapist friend and I marveled that people were willing to pay us for this. Feeling helpless and shell-shocked ourselves, we lost sight of the value of simply being there.

Gradually, there was room for deeper exploration. My clients still talked a lot about Covid, but they also talked about the 2020 elections, George Floyd’s murder, and, of course, the issues that brought them to therapy in the first place. Despite not meeting in person, it began to feel like therapy again.

Unsurprisingly, each person’s pandemic experience was filtered through psyche and circumstance. For one client who lives in constant terror at the best of times, leaving the house even while triply masked felt like stepping into a fusillade of invisible Covid bullets. Family dynamics were illuminated through heartbreaking rifts over the virus. People—including me–had to confront their often intense feelings of hostility and judgment toward unmasked people they passed on the street. There was plenty of resilience, but also a quiet unraveling.

In the midst of exhaustion and angst, something else emerged over the last year and a half: greater self-knowledge, clearer boundaries and priorities, a sense of wanting to retain some of what Covid necessitated. So many of my clients have expressed gratitude for life becoming simpler, for not having to engage with activities or people they don’t particularly like, for discovering what’s truly important to them.

With vaccines bringing relief and freedom, we are beginning to feel what we have needed to keep at bay: grief, loss, and anger, but also hope and gratitude. There’s a profound savoring of the little things we used to take for granted.

Yet reopening is also triggering the jitters. How are we to interpret a masked or maskless face? Will letting down our guard lead to a disastrous spike? Must we don social artifice, return to functions and relationships we haven’t missed, invest in elaborate ventilation and contact tracing plans for our offices? What happens now?

Perhaps my client’s prediction is coming true as our numbness begins to thaw: Now that things are better, it’s safe enough to freak out.